Old drunks and the uppity black ...

We don't yet know the truth in the matter of Herman Cain and 'sexual harassment' and we probably NEVER WILL. If you put partisanship aside, the smear campaign seems to have no merit at all, based upon the settlement in the late 1990's which has been defended thus far. The source is questionable at best ... as they won't allow questions ... just cast even greater aspersions. What to do ...

I know, lets put a cute girl in there to interview some old drunks at a Chris (tingle up my leg) Matthews function

http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/03/former-washington-post-editor-discusses-cain-sexual-harassment-story-while-pawing-daily-caller-reporter/

More sycophants:

http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/albright-cain-didnt-call-me-because-im-female

Even MORE sycophants:

http://www.rollcall.com/issues/57_53/would_herman_cain_be_leading_race_if_he_were_white-209984-1.html

And finally some rational thought --- sort of:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/nov/4/pruden-herman-cain-and-innuendos/